Genetic Variation in Heat Tolerance and Immunocompetence of Chickens Raised in Nigeria
Received 06 Jan, 2023 |
Accepted 06 Jun, 2023 |
Published 30 Sep, 2023 |
Background and Objective: Knowledge of genetic variations in heat tolerance and immunocompetence between different strains is imperative in genetic selection and enhancement of natural disease resistance in the tropics. Hence, this study compared Nera Black, Dominant Blue and Nigerian indigenous chicken strains. Materials and Methods: Heat tolerance was evaluated by measuring the pulse rate, respiratory rate, rectal temperature and heat stress index of the birds. Blood analysis was carried out to determine the blood differentials of the birds. A haemagglutination inhibition (HA/HI) test on blood samples from the birds before and after antigenic challenge with newcastle disease virus (NDV) was used to evaluate immunocompetence. Results: Nera Black had the highest means for heat tolerance traits while the Nigerian indigenous had the least. Sex significantly (p<0.05) influenced all heat tolerance traits except rectal temperature. Genotype had a significant (p<0.05) effect on the blood parameters with mean values for heterophil percentage, heterophil/lymphocyte ratio and monocyte percentage lowest for the Nigerian indigenous. The Nigerian indigenous had the highest postvaccination titer mean. Conclusion: From this study, the Nigerian indigenous chickens had higher heat tolerance and immunocompetence and were therefore better adapted to the tropics than the exotic birds studied.
Copyright © 2023 Folarin et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
INTRODUCTION
Poultry is one of the largest agricultural businesses in Nigeria, which has undergone an enormous expansion and development over time1,2. However, heat stress is one of the most serious factors affecting overall poultry production in the tropics and diseases are big causes of loss in the poultry industry3,4.
High environmental temperatures have deleterious effects on poultry, reducing the rate of growth, feed intake and nutrient digestibility, increasing mortality and reducing immunity5-8. The coordination of all the systems under thermal stress is different between species and also between breeds9, thereby providing a possibility to select for heat tolerance10.
In the same vein, knowledge of differences in disease resistance between different strains may be valuable in genetic selection programs11. Characterization and evaluation of immune parameters in various genotypes can help in enhancing natural disease resistance in tropical and subtropical environments12.
This study was a comparative analysis of three strains of chickens in Nigeria in terms of their abilities to tolerate heat and provide natural immunity against the Newcastle disease virus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Experimental birds: A total of 96 birds were used for the experiment. Day-old chicks of the Nigerian indigenous chicken were obtained from the crossing of the parent stock of pure naked neck, pure normal-feathered and pure frizzle-feathered birds maintained at the Poultry Breeding Unit of the University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, while the day-old chicks of Nera Black and Dominant Blue were purchased from a commercial parent-stock breeding farm. The chicks were wing-tagged right from the hatchery. The experiment lasted between June and December, 2009.
Experimental location: The fieldwork was conducted at the Poultry Breeding Unit of the Teaching and Research Farm of the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta (FUNAAB), Nigeria. Blood analysis was carried out at the Microbiology Laboratory of the College of Veterinary Medicine, FUNAAB.
Management and feeding: All chicks were subjected to the same controlled environment with conventional ventilation. Wood shaving litter was used at 3-5 cm thickness. Indoor ambient temperature was started at 34°C and then gradually decreased till the end of brooding.
At the brooder phase (0-6 weeks), the chick starter ration containing 21% crude protein and 10.88 MJ kg–1 metabolisable energy was fed to the chicks while at the grower phase (7-12 weeks), growers mash containing 15% crude protein and 10.46 MJ kg–1 metabolisable energy was fed to them.
Data collection
Heat tolerance traits: Rectal temperature was measured by inserting a clinical thermometer into the vent of each bird for 1 min and then taking the reading. To get the pulse rate, a stethoscope was placed under the wing vein to count the number of pulses for 15 sec. The obtained value was then multiplied by 4 to get beats/min. Respiratory rate was determined by placing the fingertips under the wing vein and counting the number of beats per minute using a stopwatch13. The measurements were done weekly for 20 weeks. The readings were taken twice, the averages were computed and recorded.
Heat stress index: The heat stress index was evaluated using the relationship between pulse rate and respiratory rate, with their normal averages as shown14:
Where:
H | = | Heat stress index | |
AR | = | Average respiratory rate value | |
AP | = | Average pulse value | |
NP | = | Normal pulse rate value | |
NR | = | Normal respiratory rate |
Blood parameters for heat tolerance: At 17 weeks of age, about 5 mL of blood was collected from each of the birds from the three strains, through the wing vein, 2 mL of which was dispensed into a clean Bijou bottle containing an anticoagulant (Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)) and labeled accordingly. The un-coagulated blood was used to determine heterophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, basophils and eosinophils counts, using standard laboratory procedures. The heterophil/lymphocyte ratio was calculated from their counts. Serum was obtained from the remaining 3 mL of blood, from which potassium and sodium were also determined.
Blood parameters for immune response: At 17 weeks of age, blood samples were taken from the three strains. Newcastle disease vaccine (NDV) was then administered to the birds the same day. As 3 weeks later, blood samples were collected from the birds again. Both the pre-vaccination blood samples and the post-vaccination samples were analyzed for the HA/HI antibody titer.
Statistical analyses: Heat tolerance traits and blood parameters measured involved both sexes, male and female. The statistical model that was used therefore accommodated the effects of sex, genotype and their interaction. The model was as follows:
Where:
Yijk | = |
Observed value of the measurable traits of the jth sex on the ith genotype | |
μ | = |
Overall mean | |
Gi | = |
Effect of the ith genotype (i = 1,2,3) | |
Xj | = |
Effect of the jth sex (j = 1,2) | |
(GX)ij | = |
Effect of the interaction of the ith genotype and the jth sex | |
Eijk | = |
Er or independently and identically distributed as normal with mean zero and constant variance |
The data were analyzed using the General Linear Model of SAS 9.0 while Duncan’s Multiple Range Test was used for separating the means15. The results are presented as Means±Standard Error (SE), at a 5% level of significance.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The Nigerian indigenous strain had the least rectal temperature while the Nera Black had the highest (Table 1). The observed significant differences in rectal temperature agreed with the report by Finch16 that there were notable differences between breeds in their abilities to regulate rectal temperature at normal environmental conditions. It was, however, observed that the rectal temperatures were within a specific range (39.41-39.98°C) among all three strains. Heat production is affected by body weight, specie/breed, production, feed intake, feed quality and activity/exercise7,17.
The highest mean values for respiratory rate were observed among the Nera Black chickens, with the peak at the 12th week. As Robert18 pointed out, the size of the animal affects the respiratory rate. As ambient temperature increases, the autonomic nervous system of birds triggers increased heartbeat (tachycardia), accompanied by an increase in respiratory rates, which helps in maintaining their body temperature3,8,19.
The Nigerian indigenous chickens had the lowest mean value for pulse rate throughout the period of the study. This could be attributed to the fact that Nigerian indigenous chickens have been reported to be well-adapted to tropical and subtropical environmental conditions due to the accumulation of genes for adaptability through natural selection1. Fayeye et al.20 reported that the feather distribution gene and the feather structure gene, which are found among the local birds, were also associated with increased heat tolerance.
Table 1: | Least squares mean and standard errors for heat tolerance traits as affected by the genotype of chickens |
Age (weeks) | Genotype |
Number |
Rectal temperature (°C) |
Pulse rate (beats min1) |
Respiratory rate (breaths min1) |
Heat stress index |
1 | Dom. Blue |
29 |
40.11±0.08b |
311.60±2.8c |
39.53±0.9a |
1.19±0.02b |
Nig. Indig. |
32 |
39.41±0.14c |
309.16±1.6b |
35.76±0.4b |
1.17±0.01b |
|
Nera Black |
35 |
40.87±0.07a |
317.90±2.1a |
42.86±0.4a |
1.22±0.01a |
|
4 | Dom. Blue |
29 |
39.95±0.09b |
307.93±2.8c |
36.20±0.6a |
1.19±0.01a |
Nig. Indig. |
32 |
39.35±0.18c |
303.42±1.6b |
31.29±0.3b |
1.16±0.01b |
|
Nera Black |
35 |
40.24±0.14a |
310.67±1.2a |
38.24±0.2a |
1.20±0.01a |
|
8 | Dom. Blue |
29 |
40.02±0.11b |
303.66±2.7b |
35.07±0.8a |
1.19±0.03a |
Nig. Indig. |
32 |
39.40±0.09b |
298.53±1.9a |
31.47±0.4b |
1.13±0.02b |
|
Nera Black |
35 |
40.98±0.07a |
308.19±1.4a |
39.30±0.3a |
1.16±0.01ab |
|
12 | Dom. Blue |
29 |
40.08±0.13b |
324.73±2.9b |
38.13±0.7a |
1.17±0.04b |
Nig. Indig. |
32 |
39.42±0.08b |
313.63±1.8a |
34.66±0.4a |
1.13±0.01c |
|
Nera Black |
35 |
40.65±0.14a |
339.07±1.5ab |
45.01±0.3a |
1.20±0.01a |
|
16 | Dom. Blue |
29 |
39.99±0.30b |
318.40±2.8b |
36.03±0.7a |
1.15±0.03c |
Nig. Indig. |
32 |
39.31±0.11c |
306.37±1.5a |
30.92±0.4b |
1.16±0.01b |
|
Nera Black |
35 |
40.33±0.08a |
325.65±1.6a |
40.07±0.2b |
1.22±0.01a |
|
20 | Dom. Blue |
29 |
39.82±0.16b |
314.67±4.6b |
34.67±0.7a |
1.15±0.03b |
Nig. Indig. |
32 |
39.24±0.07c |
308.00±4.7a |
30.68±0.4a |
1.10±0.01c |
|
Nera Black |
35 |
40.18±0.13a |
320.09±2.3b |
38.63±0.2a |
1.17±0.01a |
|
a,b,cMeans in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05) |
Table 2: | Least squares mean and standard errors for heat tolerance traits as affected by sex |
Age (weeks) | Sex |
Number |
Rectal temperature (°C) |
Pulse rate (beats min1) |
Respiratory rate (breaths min1) |
Heat Stress Index |
1 | Male |
39 |
39.82±0.16a |
308.11±2.83b |
32.58±0.90b |
1.18±0.03b |
Female |
57 |
40.15±0.10a |
315. 89±1.58a |
38.33±0.3a |
1.22±0.01a |
|
4 | Male |
39 |
39.75±0.27a |
305.20±1.19b |
30.20±0.67b |
1.17±0.02b |
Female |
57 |
40.02±0.10a |
310.01±1.20a |
36.78±0.20a |
1.21±0.01a |
|
8 | Male |
39 |
39.73±0.12a |
298.35±2.63b |
30.60±0.54b |
1.14±0.02a |
Female |
57 |
39.98±0.05a |
309.34±1.40a |
38.34±0.26a |
1.15±0.01a |
|
12 | Male |
39 |
39.88±0.22a |
307.36±1.69b |
34.78±0.70b |
1.14±0.02a |
Female |
57 |
40.31±0.12a |
313.03±1.32a |
39.45±0.23a |
1.16±0.01a |
|
16 | Male |
39 |
39.80±0.09a |
304.40±1.87b |
33.21±0.09a |
1.15±0.02a |
Female |
57 |
40.07±0.06a |
310.23±1.28a |
36.76±0.22a |
1.19±0.03a |
|
20 | Male |
39 |
39.75±0.19a |
300.02±2.43a |
30.54±0.53b |
1.13±0.02a |
Female |
57 |
39.94±0.12a |
305.43±1.80a |
34.45±0.24a |
1.18±0.01b |
|
a,bMeans in the same age in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05) |
The Nera Black had the highest means for all heat tolerance traits measured throughout the period of the experiment. This indicated a sign of susceptibility to heat stress8. The mean values for all the strains were high in the 1st week of life, however, the highest mean was at week 12. The fluctuation in pulse rate can be associated with factors like temperature, disease conditions or intense activity by the animal21.
Heat stress index is defined as a function of the deviation of actual temperature from target environmental temperature and bird age22. The higher the index, the more stressed the bird23. The Nera Black had the highest mean value, making them the most stressed of the other genotypes while the Nigerian indigenous chickens had the least, making them the least stressed. The highest heat stress index was observed at week 1, which decreased with age, an indication of adaptation to tropical environment as they advanced in age. The observed pattern of heat tolerance traits among the chicken strains is similar to that reported by Lara and Rostagno24.
Sex was found to have no significant effect on rectal temperature, though the males had lower values than the females throughout the experimental period (Table 2). However, there was a significant difference between sexes for pulse rate, respiratory rate and heat stress index. This also agreed with the report of the University of Illinois Extension aforementioned. Adedeji et al.25 reported a significant (p<0.05) effect among the sexes of pure and crossbred chicken progenies in response to heat tolerance traits, with the females having higher responses compared to their male counterparts.
Table 3: | Least squares mean and standard error for heat tolerance traits as affected by the interaction of genotype and sex of chickens |
Age (weeks) | Gen×Sex |
Rectal temperature (°C) |
Pulse rate (beats min1) |
Resp rate (breaths min1) |
Heat stress index |
1 | Dom. Blue male |
39.68±0.28bc |
306.87±0.12ab |
32.13±0.27bc |
1.17±0.08b |
Dom. Blue female |
40.22±0.32ab |
316.22±0.85ab |
36.86±0.17ab |
1.22±0.07a |
|
4 | Local male |
39.43±0.21bc |
301.08±0.14b |
30.82±0.19c |
1.16±0.02b |
Local female |
39.97±0.23bc |
310.94±0.17ab |
33.04±0.13bc |
1.18±0.03b |
|
Nera male |
40.12±0.43ab |
308.48±0.33ab |
39.10±0.15a |
1.16±0.08b |
|
Nera female |
41.02±0.21a |
326.38±0.08a |
42.23±0.13a |
1.15±0.07b |
|
Dom. Blue male |
39.62±0.11ab |
301.67±0.48b |
31.23±0.61bc |
1.18±0.09a |
|
Dom. Blue female |
40.18±0.18ab |
318.79±0.22a |
35.03±0.26ab |
1.20±0.01a |
|
8 | Local male |
39.32±0.23a |
296.75±0.27c |
30.03±2.10c |
1.13±0.06b |
Local female |
39.78±0.11b |
302.68±0.16b |
33.57±0.21b |
1.16±0.05b |
|
Nera male |
40.32±0.12a |
306.37±0.30b |
33.45±0.26b |
1.18±0.05b |
|
Nera female |
40.89±0.19a |
321.28±0.19a |
39.10±0.24a |
1.24±0.12a |
|
Dom. Blue male |
39.58±0.27b |
312.77±0.44ab |
32.70±0.26b |
1.13±0.18b |
|
Dom. Blue female |
40.26±0.31ab |
318.49±0.72a |
35.11±0.32ab |
1.17±0.09ab |
|
12 | Local male |
39.42±0.21b |
295.20±0.81b |
29.75±0.21c |
1.13±0.09b |
Local female |
39.63±0.92b |
309.02±0.29ab |
31.88±0.20b |
1.15±0.05b |
|
Nera male |
40.14±0.12ab |
311.18±0.46a |
33.95±0.21ab |
1.17±0.12b |
|
Nera female |
41.32±0.12a |
316.29±0.76a |
34.52±0.22ab |
1.23±0.20a |
|
Dom. Blue male |
39.63±0.45b |
307.83±0.65c |
38.20±0.15a |
1.16±0.14b |
|
Dom. Blue female |
40.18±0.42ab |
315.87±0.25b |
35.86±0.41ab |
1.18±0.08ab |
|
16 | Local male |
39.37±1.23bc |
305.82±0.76c |
25.37±0.24c |
1.11±0.09b |
Local female |
39.59±0.18b |
312.55±0.22b |
32.18±0.18bc |
1.14±0.12b |
|
Nera male |
40.34±0.46ab |
315.47±0.18b |
32.32±0.11bc |
1.18±0.14ab |
|
Nera female |
40.93±0.48a |
343.85±0.09a |
38.88±0.24a |
1.21±0.09a |
|
Dom. Blue male |
39.45±0.87ab |
308.47±0.20b |
32.83±0.34ab |
1.16±0.02b |
|
Dom. Blue female |
39.89±0.88a |
319.91±0.33ab |
34.33±0.50ab |
1.19±0.07ab |
|
20 | Local male |
39.23±0.45b |
300.16±0.25c |
28.96±0.27c |
1.14±0.09b |
Local female |
39.38±0.34b |
311.85±0.21b |
30.73±0.18b |
1.15±0.03b |
|
Nera male |
39.97±0.45ab |
319.58±0.32ab |
33.97±0.22ab |
1.21±0.03a |
|
Nera female |
40.26±0.66a |
328.66±0.16a |
39.35±0.24a |
1.23±0.11a |
|
Dom. Blue male |
39.74±0.22ab |
302.37±0.67bc |
30.90±0.17b |
1.14±0.19b |
|
Dom. Blue female |
40.02±0.19a |
318.54±0.43b |
37.50±0.48a |
1.17±0.21ab |
|
Local male |
39.23±0.34b |
298.50±0.24c |
29.33±0.27b |
1.09±0.05ab |
|
Local female |
39.45±0.23b |
308.31±0.19bc |
33.98±0.18ab |
1.12±0.17b |
|
Nera male |
39.87±0.32ab |
308.22±0.54bc |
32.70±0.17ab |
1.16±0.09ab |
|
Nera female |
40.45±0.67a |
322.76±0.15a |
37.67±0.17a |
1.19±0.22a |
|
a,b,cMeans for the same ages in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05) |
The sex by genotype interaction was significant on heat tolerance traits in agreement with the submission of Adedeji et al.25, with the Nigerian indigenous males having the lowest means. The interaction of sex by genotype on rectal temperature (Table 3) brought out the effect that was masked when the sex effect alone was considered.
The means of blood parameters for the three strains were significantly different (Table 4). Lymphocyte and eosinophil counts were significantly higher in the local birds than in the other two strains. The ratio of heterophils to lymphocytes was also found to be significantly lower for the Nigerian indigenous chickens. It has been reported that differential leucocyte count and the H/L ratio are sensitive indicators of stress responses relevant to immune function26,27. High heterophil counts and the H/L ratio have been related to stress28. The above results, therefore, demonstrated higher heat tolerance in the Nigerian indigenous strain than the Nera Black and the Dominant Bluebirds in agreement with previous reports of the superiority of local strains in this regard27. According to Maxwell and Robertson29, eosinophils disappeared from circulation and basophils increased in circulation during stress, particularly acute stress. The higher the eosinophils and the lower the basophils, the more heat tolerant the bird is.
Table 4: | Least squares mean and standard errors of blood parameters as affected by the genotype of chicken |
Genotype | K+ |
Na+ |
H (%) |
L (%) |
H/L |
M (%) |
B (%) |
E (%) |
Dom. Blue | 4.1±0.07a |
133.5±1.76a |
28.8±0.88a |
64.4±0.15b |
0.44±0.05b |
2.33±0.33a |
2.32±0.02a |
3.09±0.10b |
Nig. Indig. | 3.9±0.07a |
133.5±0.5a |
25.8±1.39b |
67.2±1.11a |
0.38±0.04c |
2.36±0.33a |
2.29±0.03a |
3.32±0.50a |
Nera Black | 3.9±0.08a |
134.5±0.88a |
29.6±0.67a |
63.5±0.67b |
0.46±0.03a |
2.30±0.11a |
2.45±0.02a |
3.03±0.67b |
a,b,cMeans in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05), K+: Potassium ion concentration, Na+: Sodium ion concentration, H (%): Heterophil percentage, L (%): Lymphocyte percentage, H/L: Heterophil/lymphocyte ratio, M (%): Monocyte percentage, B (%): Basophil percentage and E (%): Eosinophil percentage |
Table 5: | Least squares mean and standard errors for antibody titer as affected by the genotype of chickens |
Genotype | Pre-vaccination titre (log 2) |
Post-vaccination titre (log 2) |
Dom. Blue | 0.93±0.71a |
4.12±0.59b |
Nig. Indig. | 1.50±0.51a |
4.50±0.89a |
Nera Black | 0.87±0.46a |
3.92±0.77b |
a,bMeans in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05) |
The means of the pre-vaccination and post-vaccination antibody titers as affected by the genotype of chickens were presented in Table 5. The means of the pre-vaccination titer were not significantly different. The means of post-vaccination antibody titer were significantly higher for the Nigerian indigenous strain while Dominant Blue and Nera Black were not significantly different in means.
This showed that the Nigerian indigenous birds generated a higher immune response to the newcastle diseases virus than the other two strains. The local chickens had been said to possess genes that are believed to confer not only adaptability to the tropical climate but also disease resistance26,30. Alvarez et al.31 stated that the indigenous naked neck and normal-feathered chickens seem to have better immune responses than the commercial chicken line. There are many such reports which indicate that, in general, rural chickens are resistant to many endemic diseases and stressful environments and survive better than commercial chickens under rural conditions27,31,32. The significant difference in the blood differentials did not only reveal heat tolerance level, but it was also a measure of immune function. Reports showed that leukocyte counts also had been used as a measure of immune function in studies on sexual selection in birds32,33.
This study showed that differences in genotype accounted for variations in heat tolerance traits, rectal temperature, respiratory rate and pulse rate as well as variations in the blood parameters measured. It also revealed that the Nigerian indigenous local chickens have higher heat tolerance as well as a higher immune response to the Newcastle disease virus, thereby possessing greater adaptability for the tropical environment.
From this study, it can be recommended that the Nigerian indigenous chicken strains be used in the genetic improvement of heat tolerance and immunocompetence in commercial strains through cross-breeding. This will provide a low-cost solution that is easier to achieve in developing countries with hot climates and endemic diseases. Also, the indigenous birds can be developed into commercial lines by raising them intensively, thereby conserving the genes they possess as well as aiding future breeding endeavours.
A limitation of this study is the fact that it only compared three strains out of many and assessed resistance to only one disease out of several that are economically important in the tropics.
CONCLUSION
The major findings of this research are the superior performances of the Nigerian indigenous chickens in terms of heat tolerance and immunocompetence (especially against the newcastle disease virus). The Nigerian indigenous birds have not been given as much credit as they deserve. As observed from this study, they have an edge over the commercial strains studied when raised intensively in the tropics.
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT
It is essential to assess the adaptation of our local birds in comparison with the exotic raised within our climate. Hence this study compared the genetic variations in heat tolerance and immunocompetence of Nera Black, Dominant Blue and Nigerian indigenous chickens. The major findings of this research are the superior performances of the Nigerian indigenous chickens in terms of heat tolerance and immunocompetence (against the newcastle disease virus), which showed that they have an edge over the commercial strains studied when raised intensively in Nigeria and the tropics in general.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. Paul Akinduti of Covenant University and Dr. Babatunde Moses Ilori of the Animal Breeding and Genetics Department, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria, for their contributions to the success of the research.
REFERENCES
- Padhi, M.K., 2016. Importance of indigenous breeds of chicken for rural economy and their improvements for higher production performance. Scientifica, 2016: 2604685.
- Oladeji, J.O., 2011. Sources and utilization of poultry production information among poultry farmers in Oyo State. Int. J. Livest. Prod., 2: 11-16.
- Nawaz, A.H., K. Amoah, Q.Y. Leng, J.H. Zheng, W.L. Zhang and L. Zhang, 2021. Poultry response to heat stress: Its physiological, metabolic, and genetic implications on meat production and quality including strategies to improve broiler production in a warming world. Front. Vet. Sci., 8: 699081.
- Xu, Y., X. Lai, Z. Li, X. Zhang and Q. Luo, 2018. Effect of chronic heat stress on some physiological and immunological parameters in different breed of broilers. Poult. Sci., 97: 4073-4082.
- Mills, W., R. Critcher, C. Lee and C.J. Farr, 1999. Generation of an ∼2.4 Mb human X centromere-based minichromosome by targeted telomere-associated chromosome fragmentation in DT40. Hum. Mol. Genet., 8: 751-761.
- Naseem, M.T., S. Naseem, M. Younus, C.Z. Iqbal, A. Ghafoor, A. Aslam and S. Akhter, 2005. Effect of potassium chloride and sodium bicarbonate supplementation on thermotolerance of broilers exposed to heat stress. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 4: 891-895.
- Pawar, S.S., S. Basavaraj, L.V. Dhansing, K.N. Pandurang and K.A. Sahebrao et al., 2016. Assessing and mitigating the impact of heat stress in poultry. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 4: 332-341.
- Wasti, S., N. Sah and B. Mishra, 2020. Impact of heat stress on poultry health and performances, and potential mitigation strategies. Animals, 10: 1266.
- Silanikove, N., 2000. The physiological basis of adaptation in goats to harsh environments. Small Ruminant Res., 35: 181-193.
- Nawaz, A.H., S. Lin, F. Wang, J. Zheng and J. Sun et al., 2023. Investigating the heat tolerance and production performance in local chicken breed having normal and dwarf size. Animal, 17: 100707.
- Ilaya, B.D., M.G. Raj and P. Shamsudeen, 2016. Selection methods for disease resistance in poultry-An overview. Int. J. Sci. Environ. Technol., 5: 810-815.
- El-Safty, S.A., U.M. Ali and M.M. Fathi, 2006. Immunological parameters and laying performance of naked neck and normally feathered genotypes of chicken under winter conditions of Egypt. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 5: 780-785.
- Femi, O.J., T.O. Mariam, E.A. Henry, A.E. Yemi, A. Onaopemipo and K. Bello, 2023. Physiological indicators and stress index of scavenging chickens at lafarge (Ewekoro) and dangote (Ibese) cement factory areas of Ogun State. J. Austrian Soc. Agric. Econ., 19: 1679-1686.
- Amevor, Y., D. Addison and J.K. Sosu, 2022. Comparative study on thermo-tolerant and estimated breeding values of four (4) strains of indigenous chicken in the sagnarigu municipality of Ghana. World J. Pharm. Life Sci., 8: 6-13.
- Gomez, K.A. and A.A. Gomez, 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Edn., John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, ISBN-13: 9780471870920, Pages: 704.
- Finch, V.A., 1986. Body temperature in beef cattle: Its control and relevance to production in the tropics. J. Anim. Sci., 62: 531-542.
- Lyde, N.A., K.B.H. Wenceslas, F. Nambaté and A.G.A. Béatrice, 2018. Effect of genotype on morphometric traits and body temperature of three genotypes of chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) raised in the humid tropical stressful environment. Int. J. Adv. Res., 5: 1489-1498.
- Robert, A.V., 1994. Raising Healthy Goats Under Primitive Conditions. Christian Veterinary Mission, Lynnwood, Washington, United States, ISBN-10: 1886532044, Pages: 156.
- Teyssier, J.R., G. Brugaletta, F. Sirri, S. Dridi and S.J. Rochell, 2022. A review of heat stress in chickens. Part II: Insights into protein and energy utilization and feeding. Front. Physiol., 13: 943612.
- Fayeye, T.R., K.L. Ayorinde, V. Ojo and O.M. Adesina, 2006. Frequency and influence of some major genes on body weight and body size parameters of Nigerian local chickens. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., 18.
- Bello, S.A., O.G. Akintunde, A.O. Sonibare and E.B. Otesile, 2016. Effect of sex, age and time of the day on vital parameters of apparently healthy west African dwarf goats in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Alexandria J. Vet. Sci., 49: 18-23.
- Ryder, A.A., J.J.R. Feddes and M.J. Zuidhof, 2004. Field study to relate heat stress index to broiler performance. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 13: 493-499.
- Wang, Y., P. Saelao, K. Chanthavixay, R. Gallardo and D. Bunn et al., 2018. Physiological responses to heat stress in two genetically distinct chicken inbred lines. Poult. Sci., 97: 770-780.
- Lara, L.J. and M.H. Rostagno, 2013. Impact of heat stress on poultry production. Animal, 3: 356-369.
- Adedeji, T.A., O.T. Aderoju,, A.M. Adebimpe and B. Matheuw, 2015. Genotype-sex interaction in relation to heat tolerance attributes of pure and crossbred chicken progenies. J. Biol. Agric. Healthcare, 5: 43-49.
- Atansuyi, A.J., T.Z. Ogunribido and C.A. Chineke, 2019. Haematological and serum biochemical characteristics of four chicken genotypes in South-Western, Nigeria. Niger. J. Anim. Sci., 21: 9-16.
- Shini, S., 2003. Physiological responses of laying hens to the alternative housing systems. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 2: 357-360.
- El-Safty, S.A.R., 2012. Comparative study on some immunological traits in two different genetic groups of chicken. Vet. World, 5: 645-650.
- Maxwell, M.H. and G.W. Robertson, 1998. The avian heterophil leucocyte: A review. World's Poult. Sci. J., 54: 155-178.
- Haunshi, S., D. Sharma, L.M.S. Nayal, D.P. Singh and R.V. Singh, 2002. Effect of naked neck gene (NA) and frizzle gene (F) on immunocompetence in chickens. Br. Poult. Sci., 43: 28-32.
- Alvarez, M.T., N. Ledesma, G. Téllez, J.L. Molinari and P. Tato, 2003. Comparison of the immune responses against Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum infection between naked neck chickens and a commercial chicken line. Avian Pathol., 32: 193-203.
- Dufva, R. and K. Allander, 1995. Intraspecific variation in plumage coloration reflects immune response in great tit (Parus major) males. Funct. Ecol., 9: 785-789.
- Johnsen, T.S. and M. Zuk, 1998. Parasites, morphology, and blood characters in male red jungle fowl during development. Condor, 100: 749-752.
How to Cite this paper?
APA-7 Style
Folarin,
I.A., Wheto,
M., Peters,
S., Idowu,
O.M., Ikeobi,
C.O. (2023). Genetic Variation in Heat Tolerance and Immunocompetence of Chickens Raised in Nigeria. Trends in Agricultural Sciences, 2(3), 241-248. https://doi.org/10.17311/tas.2023.241.248
ACS Style
Folarin,
I.A.; Wheto,
M.; Peters,
S.; Idowu,
O.M.; Ikeobi,
C.O. Genetic Variation in Heat Tolerance and Immunocompetence of Chickens Raised in Nigeria. Trends Agric. Sci 2023, 2, 241-248. https://doi.org/10.17311/tas.2023.241.248
AMA Style
Folarin
IA, Wheto
M, Peters
S, Idowu
OM, Ikeobi
CO. Genetic Variation in Heat Tolerance and Immunocompetence of Chickens Raised in Nigeria. Trends in Agricultural Sciences. 2023; 2(3): 241-248. https://doi.org/10.17311/tas.2023.241.248
Chicago/Turabian Style
Folarin, Itunuola, Anne, Mathew Wheto, Sunday Peters, Olusegun Mark Obafemi Idowu, and Christian Obiora Ndubuisi Ikeobi.
2023. "Genetic Variation in Heat Tolerance and Immunocompetence of Chickens Raised in Nigeria" Trends in Agricultural Sciences 2, no. 3: 241-248. https://doi.org/10.17311/tas.2023.241.248
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.