Research Article | Open Access

Genetic Variation in Heat Tolerance and Immunocompetence of Chickens Raised in Nigeria

    Itunuola Anne Folarin

    Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, P.M.B. 2240, Alabata Road, 111101, Abeokuta, Ogun, Nigeria

    Mathew Wheto

    Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, P.M.B. 2240, Alabata Road, 111101, Abeokuta, Ogun, Nigeria

    Sunday Peters

    Department of Animal Science, Berry College, Mount Berry, GA 30149, United States of America

    Olusegun Mark Obafemi Idowu

    Department of Animal Nutrition, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, P.M.B. 2240, Alabata Road, 111101 Abeokuta, Ogun, Nigeria

    Christian Obiora Ndubuisi Ikeobi

    Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, P.M.B. 2240, Alabata Road, 111101, Abeokuta, Ogun, Nigeria


Received
06 Jan, 2023
Accepted
06 Jun, 2023
Published
30 Sep, 2023

Background and Objective: Knowledge of genetic variations in heat tolerance and immunocompetence between different strains is imperative in genetic selection and enhancement of natural disease resistance in the tropics. Hence, this study compared Nera Black, Dominant Blue and Nigerian indigenous chicken strains. Materials and Methods: Heat tolerance was evaluated by measuring the pulse rate, respiratory rate, rectal temperature and heat stress index of the birds. Blood analysis was carried out to determine the blood differentials of the birds. A haemagglutination inhibition (HA/HI) test on blood samples from the birds before and after antigenic challenge with newcastle disease virus (NDV) was used to evaluate immunocompetence. Results: Nera Black had the highest means for heat tolerance traits while the Nigerian indigenous had the least. Sex significantly (p<0.05) influenced all heat tolerance traits except rectal temperature. Genotype had a significant (p<0.05) effect on the blood parameters with mean values for heterophil percentage, heterophil/lymphocyte ratio and monocyte percentage lowest for the Nigerian indigenous. The Nigerian indigenous had the highest postvaccination titer mean. Conclusion: From this study, the Nigerian indigenous chickens had higher heat tolerance and immunocompetence and were therefore better adapted to the tropics than the exotic birds studied.

Copyright © 2023 Folarin et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

INTRODUCTION

Poultry is one of the largest agricultural businesses in Nigeria, which has undergone an enormous expansion and development over time1,2. However, heat stress is one of the most serious factors affecting overall poultry production in the tropics and diseases are big causes of loss in the poultry industry3,4.

High environmental temperatures have deleterious effects on poultry, reducing the rate of growth, feed intake and nutrient digestibility, increasing mortality and reducing immunity5-8. The coordination of all the systems under thermal stress is different between species and also between breeds9, thereby providing a possibility to select for heat tolerance10.

In the same vein, knowledge of differences in disease resistance between different strains may be valuable in genetic selection programs11. Characterization and evaluation of immune parameters in various genotypes can help in enhancing natural disease resistance in tropical and subtropical environments12.

This study was a comparative analysis of three strains of chickens in Nigeria in terms of their abilities to tolerate heat and provide natural immunity against the Newcastle disease virus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental birds: A total of 96 birds were used for the experiment. Day-old chicks of the Nigerian indigenous chicken were obtained from the crossing of the parent stock of pure naked neck, pure normal-feathered and pure frizzle-feathered birds maintained at the Poultry Breeding Unit of the University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, while the day-old chicks of Nera Black and Dominant Blue were purchased from a commercial parent-stock breeding farm. The chicks were wing-tagged right from the hatchery. The experiment lasted between June and December, 2009.

Experimental location: The fieldwork was conducted at the Poultry Breeding Unit of the Teaching and Research Farm of the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta (FUNAAB), Nigeria. Blood analysis was carried out at the Microbiology Laboratory of the College of Veterinary Medicine, FUNAAB.

Management and feeding: All chicks were subjected to the same controlled environment with conventional ventilation. Wood shaving litter was used at 3-5 cm thickness. Indoor ambient temperature was started at 34°C and then gradually decreased till the end of brooding.

At the brooder phase (0-6 weeks), the chick starter ration containing 21% crude protein and 10.88 MJ kg1 metabolisable energy was fed to the chicks while at the grower phase (7-12 weeks), growers mash containing 15% crude protein and 10.46 MJ kg1 metabolisable energy was fed to them.

Data collection
Heat tolerance traits: Rectal temperature was measured by inserting a clinical thermometer into the vent of each bird for 1 min and then taking the reading. To get the pulse rate, a stethoscope was placed under the wing vein to count the number of pulses for 15 sec. The obtained value was then multiplied by 4 to get beats/min. Respiratory rate was determined by placing the fingertips under the wing vein and counting the number of beats per minute using a stopwatch13. The measurements were done weekly for 20 weeks. The readings were taken twice, the averages were computed and recorded.

Heat stress index: The heat stress index was evaluated using the relationship between pulse rate and respiratory rate, with their normal averages as shown14:


Where:
  H = Heat stress index
  AR = Average respiratory rate value
  AP = Average pulse value
  NP = Normal pulse rate value
  NR = Normal respiratory rate

Blood parameters for heat tolerance: At 17 weeks of age, about 5 mL of blood was collected from each of the birds from the three strains, through the wing vein, 2 mL of which was dispensed into a clean Bijou bottle containing an anticoagulant (Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)) and labeled accordingly. The un-coagulated blood was used to determine heterophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, basophils and eosinophils counts, using standard laboratory procedures. The heterophil/lymphocyte ratio was calculated from their counts. Serum was obtained from the remaining 3 mL of blood, from which potassium and sodium were also determined.

Blood parameters for immune response: At 17 weeks of age, blood samples were taken from the three strains. Newcastle disease vaccine (NDV) was then administered to the birds the same day. As 3 weeks later, blood samples were collected from the birds again. Both the pre-vaccination blood samples and the post-vaccination samples were analyzed for the HA/HI antibody titer.

Statistical analyses: Heat tolerance traits and blood parameters measured involved both sexes, male and female. The statistical model that was used therefore accommodated the effects of sex, genotype and their interaction. The model was as follows:

Yijk = μ+Gi+Xj+(GX)ij+Eijk


Where:
  Yijk
=
Observed value of the measurable traits of the jth sex on the ith genotype
  μ
=
Overall mean
  Gi
=
Effect of the ith genotype (i = 1,2,3)
  Xj
=
Effect of the jth sex (j = 1,2)
  (GX)ij
=
Effect of the interaction of the ith genotype and the jth sex
  Eijk
=
Er or independently and identically distributed as normal with mean zero and constant variance

The data were analyzed using the General Linear Model of SAS 9.0 while Duncan’s Multiple Range Test was used for separating the means15. The results are presented as Means±Standard Error (SE), at a 5% level of significance.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The Nigerian indigenous strain had the least rectal temperature while the Nera Black had the highest (Table 1). The observed significant differences in rectal temperature agreed with the report by Finch16 that there were notable differences between breeds in their abilities to regulate rectal temperature at normal environmental conditions. It was, however, observed that the rectal temperatures were within a specific range (39.41-39.98°C) among all three strains. Heat production is affected by body weight, specie/breed, production, feed intake, feed quality and activity/exercise7,17.

The highest mean values for respiratory rate were observed among the Nera Black chickens, with the peak at the 12th week. As Robert18 pointed out, the size of the animal affects the respiratory rate. As ambient temperature increases, the autonomic nervous system of birds triggers increased heartbeat (tachycardia), accompanied by an increase in respiratory rates, which helps in maintaining their body temperature3,8,19.

The Nigerian indigenous chickens had the lowest mean value for pulse rate throughout the period of the study. This could be attributed to the fact that Nigerian indigenous chickens have been reported to be well-adapted to tropical and subtropical environmental conditions due to the accumulation of genes for adaptability through natural selection1. Fayeye et al.20 reported that the feather distribution gene and the feather structure gene, which are found among the local birds, were also associated with increased heat tolerance.

Table 1: Least squares mean and standard errors for heat tolerance traits as affected by the genotype of chickens
Age (weeks)
Genotype
Number
Rectal
temperature (°C)
Pulse rate
(beats min1)
Respiratory rate
(breaths min1)
Heat
stress index
1
Dom. Blue
29
40.11±0.08b
311.60±2.8c
39.53±0.9a
1.19±0.02b
Nig. Indig.
32
39.41±0.14c
309.16±1.6b
35.76±0.4b
1.17±0.01b
Nera Black
35
40.87±0.07a
317.90±2.1a
42.86±0.4a
1.22±0.01a
4
Dom. Blue
29
39.95±0.09b
307.93±2.8c
36.20±0.6a
1.19±0.01a
Nig. Indig.
32
39.35±0.18c
303.42±1.6b
31.29±0.3b
1.16±0.01b
Nera Black
35
40.24±0.14a
310.67±1.2a
38.24±0.2a
1.20±0.01a
8
Dom. Blue
29
40.02±0.11b
303.66±2.7b
35.07±0.8a
1.19±0.03a
Nig. Indig.
32
39.40±0.09b
298.53±1.9a
31.47±0.4b
1.13±0.02b
Nera Black
35
40.98±0.07a
308.19±1.4a
39.30±0.3a
1.16±0.01ab
12
Dom. Blue
29
40.08±0.13b
324.73±2.9b
38.13±0.7a
1.17±0.04b
Nig. Indig.
32
39.42±0.08b
313.63±1.8a
34.66±0.4a
1.13±0.01c
Nera Black
35
40.65±0.14a
339.07±1.5ab
45.01±0.3a
1.20±0.01a
16
Dom. Blue
29
39.99±0.30b
318.40±2.8b
36.03±0.7a
1.15±0.03c
Nig. Indig.
32
39.31±0.11c
306.37±1.5a
30.92±0.4b
1.16±0.01b
Nera Black
35
40.33±0.08a
325.65±1.6a
40.07±0.2b
1.22±0.01a
20
Dom. Blue
29
39.82±0.16b
314.67±4.6b
34.67±0.7a
1.15±0.03b
Nig. Indig.
32
39.24±0.07c
308.00±4.7a
30.68±0.4a
1.10±0.01c
Nera Black
35
40.18±0.13a
320.09±2.3b
38.63±0.2a
1.17±0.01a
a,b,cMeans in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05)

Table 2: Least squares mean and standard errors for heat tolerance traits as affected by sex
Age (weeks)
Sex
Number
Rectal
temperature (°C)
Pulse rate
(beats min1)
Respiratory rate
(breaths min1)
Heat
Stress Index
1
Male
39
39.82±0.16a
308.11±2.83b
32.58±0.90b
1.18±0.03b
Female
57
40.15±0.10a
315. 89±1.58a
38.33±0.3a
1.22±0.01a
4
Male
39
39.75±0.27a
305.20±1.19b
30.20±0.67b
1.17±0.02b
Female
57
40.02±0.10a
310.01±1.20a
36.78±0.20a
1.21±0.01a
8
Male
39
39.73±0.12a
298.35±2.63b
30.60±0.54b
1.14±0.02a
Female
57
39.98±0.05a
309.34±1.40a
38.34±0.26a
1.15±0.01a
12
Male
39
39.88±0.22a
307.36±1.69b
34.78±0.70b
1.14±0.02a
Female
57
40.31±0.12a
313.03±1.32a
39.45±0.23a
1.16±0.01a
16
Male
39
39.80±0.09a
304.40±1.87b
33.21±0.09a
1.15±0.02a
Female
57
40.07±0.06a
310.23±1.28a
36.76±0.22a
1.19±0.03a
20
Male
39
39.75±0.19a
300.02±2.43a
30.54±0.53b
1.13±0.02a
Female
57
39.94±0.12a
305.43±1.80a
34.45±0.24a
1.18±0.01b
a,bMeans in the same age in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05)

The Nera Black had the highest means for all heat tolerance traits measured throughout the period of the experiment. This indicated a sign of susceptibility to heat stress8. The mean values for all the strains were high in the 1st week of life, however, the highest mean was at week 12. The fluctuation in pulse rate can be associated with factors like temperature, disease conditions or intense activity by the animal21.

Heat stress index is defined as a function of the deviation of actual temperature from target environmental temperature and bird age22. The higher the index, the more stressed the bird23. The Nera Black had the highest mean value, making them the most stressed of the other genotypes while the Nigerian indigenous chickens had the least, making them the least stressed. The highest heat stress index was observed at week 1, which decreased with age, an indication of adaptation to tropical environment as they advanced in age. The observed pattern of heat tolerance traits among the chicken strains is similar to that reported by Lara and Rostagno24.

Sex was found to have no significant effect on rectal temperature, though the males had lower values than the females throughout the experimental period (Table 2). However, there was a significant difference between sexes for pulse rate, respiratory rate and heat stress index. This also agreed with the report of the University of Illinois Extension aforementioned. Adedeji et al.25 reported a significant (p<0.05) effect among the sexes of pure and crossbred chicken progenies in response to heat tolerance traits, with the females having higher responses compared to their male counterparts.

Table 3: Least squares mean and standard error for heat tolerance traits as affected by the interaction of genotype and sex of chickens
Age (weeks)
Gen×Sex
Rectal
temperature (°C)
Pulse rate
(beats min1)
Resp rate
(breaths min1)
Heat
stress index
1
Dom. Blue male
39.68±0.28bc
306.87±0.12ab
32.13±0.27bc
1.17±0.08b
Dom. Blue female
40.22±0.32ab
316.22±0.85ab
36.86±0.17ab
1.22±0.07a
4
Local male
39.43±0.21bc
301.08±0.14b
30.82±0.19c
1.16±0.02b
Local female
39.97±0.23bc
310.94±0.17ab
33.04±0.13bc
1.18±0.03b
Nera male
40.12±0.43ab
308.48±0.33ab
39.10±0.15a
1.16±0.08b
Nera female
41.02±0.21a
326.38±0.08a
42.23±0.13a
1.15±0.07b
Dom. Blue male
39.62±0.11ab
301.67±0.48b
31.23±0.61bc
1.18±0.09a
Dom. Blue female
40.18±0.18ab
318.79±0.22a
35.03±0.26ab
1.20±0.01a
8
Local male
39.32±0.23a
296.75±0.27c
30.03±2.10c
1.13±0.06b
Local female
39.78±0.11b
302.68±0.16b
33.57±0.21b
1.16±0.05b
Nera male
40.32±0.12a
306.37±0.30b
33.45±0.26b
1.18±0.05b
Nera female
40.89±0.19a
321.28±0.19a
39.10±0.24a
1.24±0.12a
Dom. Blue male
39.58±0.27b
312.77±0.44ab
32.70±0.26b
1.13±0.18b
Dom. Blue female
40.26±0.31ab
318.49±0.72a
35.11±0.32ab
1.17±0.09ab
12
Local male
39.42±0.21b
295.20±0.81b
29.75±0.21c
1.13±0.09b
Local female
39.63±0.92b
309.02±0.29ab
31.88±0.20b
1.15±0.05b
Nera male
40.14±0.12ab
311.18±0.46a
33.95±0.21ab
1.17±0.12b
Nera female
41.32±0.12a
316.29±0.76a
34.52±0.22ab
1.23±0.20a
Dom. Blue male
39.63±0.45b
307.83±0.65c
38.20±0.15a
1.16±0.14b
Dom. Blue female
40.18±0.42ab
315.87±0.25b
35.86±0.41ab
1.18±0.08ab
16
Local male
39.37±1.23bc
305.82±0.76c
25.37±0.24c
1.11±0.09b
Local female
39.59±0.18b
312.55±0.22b
32.18±0.18bc
1.14±0.12b
Nera male
40.34±0.46ab
315.47±0.18b
32.32±0.11bc
1.18±0.14ab
Nera female
40.93±0.48a
343.85±0.09a
38.88±0.24a
1.21±0.09a
Dom. Blue male
39.45±0.87ab
308.47±0.20b
32.83±0.34ab
1.16±0.02b
Dom. Blue female
39.89±0.88a
319.91±0.33ab
34.33±0.50ab
1.19±0.07ab
20
Local male
39.23±0.45b
300.16±0.25c
28.96±0.27c
1.14±0.09b
Local female
39.38±0.34b
311.85±0.21b
30.73±0.18b
1.15±0.03b
Nera male
39.97±0.45ab
319.58±0.32ab
33.97±0.22ab
1.21±0.03a
Nera female
40.26±0.66a
328.66±0.16a
39.35±0.24a
1.23±0.11a
Dom. Blue male
39.74±0.22ab
302.37±0.67bc
30.90±0.17b
1.14±0.19b
Dom. Blue female
40.02±0.19a
318.54±0.43b
37.50±0.48a
1.17±0.21ab
Local male
39.23±0.34b
298.50±0.24c
29.33±0.27b
1.09±0.05ab
Local female
39.45±0.23b
308.31±0.19bc
33.98±0.18ab
1.12±0.17b
Nera male
39.87±0.32ab
308.22±0.54bc
32.70±0.17ab
1.16±0.09ab
Nera female
40.45±0.67a
322.76±0.15a
37.67±0.17a
1.19±0.22a
a,b,cMeans for the same ages in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05)

The sex by genotype interaction was significant on heat tolerance traits in agreement with the submission of Adedeji et al.25, with the Nigerian indigenous males having the lowest means. The interaction of sex by genotype on rectal temperature (Table 3) brought out the effect that was masked when the sex effect alone was considered.

The means of blood parameters for the three strains were significantly different (Table 4). Lymphocyte and eosinophil counts were significantly higher in the local birds than in the other two strains. The ratio of heterophils to lymphocytes was also found to be significantly lower for the Nigerian indigenous chickens. It has been reported that differential leucocyte count and the H/L ratio are sensitive indicators of stress responses relevant to immune function26,27. High heterophil counts and the H/L ratio have been related to stress28. The above results, therefore, demonstrated higher heat tolerance in the Nigerian indigenous strain than the Nera Black and the Dominant Bluebirds in agreement with previous reports of the superiority of local strains in this regard27. According to Maxwell and Robertson29, eosinophils disappeared from circulation and basophils increased in circulation during stress, particularly acute stress. The higher the eosinophils and the lower the basophils, the more heat tolerant the bird is.

Table 4: Least squares mean and standard errors of blood parameters as affected by the genotype of chicken
Genotype
K+
Na+
H (%)
L (%)
H/L
M (%)
B (%)
E (%)
Dom. Blue
4.1±0.07a
133.5±1.76a
28.8±0.88a
64.4±0.15b
0.44±0.05b
2.33±0.33a
2.32±0.02a
3.09±0.10b
Nig. Indig.
3.9±0.07a
133.5±0.5a
25.8±1.39b
67.2±1.11a
0.38±0.04c
2.36±0.33a
2.29±0.03a
3.32±0.50a
Nera Black
3.9±0.08a
134.5±0.88a
29.6±0.67a
63.5±0.67b
0.46±0.03a
2.30±0.11a
2.45±0.02a
3.03±0.67b
a,b,cMeans in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05), K+: Potassium ion concentration, Na+: Sodium ion concentration, H (%): Heterophil percentage, L (%): Lymphocyte percentage, H/L: Heterophil/lymphocyte ratio, M (%): Monocyte percentage, B (%): Basophil percentage and E (%): Eosinophil percentage

Table 5: Least squares mean and standard errors for antibody titer as affected by the genotype of chickens
Genotype
Pre-vaccination titre (log 2)
Post-vaccination titre (log 2)
Dom. Blue
0.93±0.71a
4.12±0.59b
Nig. Indig.
1.50±0.51a
4.50±0.89a
Nera Black
0.87±0.46a
3.92±0.77b
a,bMeans in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05)

The means of the pre-vaccination and post-vaccination antibody titers as affected by the genotype of chickens were presented in Table 5. The means of the pre-vaccination titer were not significantly different. The means of post-vaccination antibody titer were significantly higher for the Nigerian indigenous strain while Dominant Blue and Nera Black were not significantly different in means.

This showed that the Nigerian indigenous birds generated a higher immune response to the newcastle diseases virus than the other two strains. The local chickens had been said to possess genes that are believed to confer not only adaptability to the tropical climate but also disease resistance26,30. Alvarez et al.31 stated that the indigenous naked neck and normal-feathered chickens seem to have better immune responses than the commercial chicken line. There are many such reports which indicate that, in general, rural chickens are resistant to many endemic diseases and stressful environments and survive better than commercial chickens under rural conditions27,31,32. The significant difference in the blood differentials did not only reveal heat tolerance level, but it was also a measure of immune function. Reports showed that leukocyte counts also had been used as a measure of immune function in studies on sexual selection in birds32,33.

This study showed that differences in genotype accounted for variations in heat tolerance traits, rectal temperature, respiratory rate and pulse rate as well as variations in the blood parameters measured. It also revealed that the Nigerian indigenous local chickens have higher heat tolerance as well as a higher immune response to the Newcastle disease virus, thereby possessing greater adaptability for the tropical environment.

From this study, it can be recommended that the Nigerian indigenous chicken strains be used in the genetic improvement of heat tolerance and immunocompetence in commercial strains through cross-breeding. This will provide a low-cost solution that is easier to achieve in developing countries with hot climates and endemic diseases. Also, the indigenous birds can be developed into commercial lines by raising them intensively, thereby conserving the genes they possess as well as aiding future breeding endeavours.

A limitation of this study is the fact that it only compared three strains out of many and assessed resistance to only one disease out of several that are economically important in the tropics.

CONCLUSION

The major findings of this research are the superior performances of the Nigerian indigenous chickens in terms of heat tolerance and immunocompetence (especially against the newcastle disease virus). The Nigerian indigenous birds have not been given as much credit as they deserve. As observed from this study, they have an edge over the commercial strains studied when raised intensively in the tropics.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

It is essential to assess the adaptation of our local birds in comparison with the exotic raised within our climate. Hence this study compared the genetic variations in heat tolerance and immunocompetence of Nera Black, Dominant Blue and Nigerian indigenous chickens. The major findings of this research are the superior performances of the Nigerian indigenous chickens in terms of heat tolerance and immunocompetence (against the newcastle disease virus), which showed that they have an edge over the commercial strains studied when raised intensively in Nigeria and the tropics in general.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. Paul Akinduti of Covenant University and Dr. Babatunde Moses Ilori of the Animal Breeding and Genetics Department, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria, for their contributions to the success of the research.

REFERENCES

  1. Padhi, M.K., 2016. Importance of indigenous breeds of chicken for rural economy and their improvements for higher production performance. Scientifica, 2016: 2604685.
  2. Oladeji, J.O., 2011. Sources and utilization of poultry production information among poultry farmers in Oyo State. Int. J. Livest. Prod., 2: 11-16.
  3. Nawaz, A.H., K. Amoah, Q.Y. Leng, J.H. Zheng, W.L. Zhang and L. Zhang, 2021. Poultry response to heat stress: Its physiological, metabolic, and genetic implications on meat production and quality including strategies to improve broiler production in a warming world. Front. Vet. Sci., 8: 699081.
  4. Xu, Y., X. Lai, Z. Li, X. Zhang and Q. Luo, 2018. Effect of chronic heat stress on some physiological and immunological parameters in different breed of broilers. Poult. Sci., 97: 4073-4082.
  5. Mills, W., R. Critcher, C. Lee and C.J. Farr, 1999. Generation of an ∼2.4 Mb human X centromere-based minichromosome by targeted telomere-associated chromosome fragmentation in DT40. Hum. Mol. Genet., 8: 751-761.
  6. Naseem, M.T., S. Naseem, M. Younus, C.Z. Iqbal, A. Ghafoor, A. Aslam and S. Akhter, 2005. Effect of potassium chloride and sodium bicarbonate supplementation on thermotolerance of broilers exposed to heat stress. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 4: 891-895.
  7. Pawar, S.S., S. Basavaraj, L.V. Dhansing, K.N. Pandurang and K.A. Sahebrao et al., 2016. Assessing and mitigating the impact of heat stress in poultry. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 4: 332-341.
  8. Wasti, S., N. Sah and B. Mishra, 2020. Impact of heat stress on poultry health and performances, and potential mitigation strategies. Animals, 10: 1266.
  9. Silanikove, N., 2000. The physiological basis of adaptation in goats to harsh environments. Small Ruminant Res., 35: 181-193.
  10. Nawaz, A.H., S. Lin, F. Wang, J. Zheng and J. Sun et al., 2023. Investigating the heat tolerance and production performance in local chicken breed having normal and dwarf size. Animal, 17: 100707.
  11. Ilaya, B.D., M.G. Raj and P. Shamsudeen, 2016. Selection methods for disease resistance in poultry-An overview. Int. J. Sci. Environ. Technol., 5: 810-815.
  12. El-Safty, S.A., U.M. Ali and M.M. Fathi, 2006. Immunological parameters and laying performance of naked neck and normally feathered genotypes of chicken under winter conditions of Egypt. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 5: 780-785.
  13. Femi, O.J., T.O. Mariam, E.A. Henry, A.E. Yemi, A. Onaopemipo and K. Bello, 2023. Physiological indicators and stress index of scavenging chickens at lafarge (Ewekoro) and dangote (Ibese) cement factory areas of Ogun State. J. Austrian Soc. Agric. Econ., 19: 1679-1686.
  14. Amevor, Y., D. Addison and J.K. Sosu, 2022. Comparative study on thermo-tolerant and estimated breeding values of four (4) strains of indigenous chicken in the sagnarigu municipality of Ghana. World J. Pharm. Life Sci., 8: 6-13.
  15. Gomez, K.A. and A.A. Gomez, 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Edn., John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, ISBN-13: 9780471870920, Pages: 704.
  16. Finch, V.A., 1986. Body temperature in beef cattle: Its control and relevance to production in the tropics. J. Anim. Sci., 62: 531-542.
  17. Lyde, N.A., K.B.H. Wenceslas, F. Nambaté and A.G.A. Béatrice, 2018. Effect of genotype on morphometric traits and body temperature of three genotypes of chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) raised in the humid tropical stressful environment. Int. J. Adv. Res., 5: 1489-1498.
  18. Robert, A.V., 1994. Raising Healthy Goats Under Primitive Conditions. Christian Veterinary Mission, Lynnwood, Washington, United States, ISBN-10: 1886532044, Pages: 156.
  19. Teyssier, J.R., G. Brugaletta, F. Sirri, S. Dridi and S.J. Rochell, 2022. A review of heat stress in chickens. Part II: Insights into protein and energy utilization and feeding. Front. Physiol., 13: 943612.
  20. Fayeye, T.R., K.L. Ayorinde, V. Ojo and O.M. Adesina, 2006. Frequency and influence of some major genes on body weight and body size parameters of Nigerian local chickens. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., 18.
  21. Bello, S.A., O.G. Akintunde, A.O. Sonibare and E.B. Otesile, 2016. Effect of sex, age and time of the day on vital parameters of apparently healthy west African dwarf goats in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Alexandria J. Vet. Sci., 49: 18-23.
  22. Ryder, A.A., J.J.R. Feddes and M.J. Zuidhof, 2004. Field study to relate heat stress index to broiler performance. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 13: 493-499.
  23. Wang, Y., P. Saelao, K. Chanthavixay, R. Gallardo and D. Bunn et al., 2018. Physiological responses to heat stress in two genetically distinct chicken inbred lines. Poult. Sci., 97: 770-780.
  24. Lara, L.J. and M.H. Rostagno, 2013. Impact of heat stress on poultry production. Animal, 3: 356-369.
  25. Adedeji, T.A., O.T. Aderoju,, A.M. Adebimpe and B. Matheuw, 2015. Genotype-sex interaction in relation to heat tolerance attributes of pure and crossbred chicken progenies. J. Biol. Agric. Healthcare, 5: 43-49.
  26. Atansuyi, A.J., T.Z. Ogunribido and C.A. Chineke, 2019. Haematological and serum biochemical characteristics of four chicken genotypes in South-Western, Nigeria. Niger. J. Anim. Sci., 21: 9-16.
  27. Shini, S., 2003. Physiological responses of laying hens to the alternative housing systems. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 2: 357-360.
  28. El-Safty, S.A.R., 2012. Comparative study on some immunological traits in two different genetic groups of chicken. Vet. World, 5: 645-650.
  29. Maxwell, M.H. and G.W. Robertson, 1998. The avian heterophil leucocyte: A review. World's Poult. Sci. J., 54: 155-178.
  30. Haunshi, S., D. Sharma, L.M.S. Nayal, D.P. Singh and R.V. Singh, 2002. Effect of naked neck gene (NA) and frizzle gene (F) on immunocompetence in chickens. Br. Poult. Sci., 43: 28-32.
  31. Alvarez, M.T., N. Ledesma, G. Téllez, J.L. Molinari and P. Tato, 2003. Comparison of the immune responses against Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum infection between naked neck chickens and a commercial chicken line. Avian Pathol., 32: 193-203.
  32. Dufva, R. and K. Allander, 1995. Intraspecific variation in plumage coloration reflects immune response in great tit (Parus major) males. Funct. Ecol., 9: 785-789.
  33. Johnsen, T.S. and M. Zuk, 1998. Parasites, morphology, and blood characters in male red jungle fowl during development. Condor, 100: 749-752.

How to Cite this paper?


APA-7 Style
Folarin, I.A., Wheto, M., Peters, S., Idowu, O.M., Ikeobi, C.O. (2023). Genetic Variation in Heat Tolerance and Immunocompetence of Chickens Raised in Nigeria. Trends in Agricultural Sciences, 2(3), 241-248. https://doi.org/10.17311/tas.2023.241.248

ACS Style
Folarin, I.A.; Wheto, M.; Peters, S.; Idowu, O.M.; Ikeobi, C.O. Genetic Variation in Heat Tolerance and Immunocompetence of Chickens Raised in Nigeria. Trends Agric. Sci 2023, 2, 241-248. https://doi.org/10.17311/tas.2023.241.248

AMA Style
Folarin IA, Wheto M, Peters S, Idowu OM, Ikeobi CO. Genetic Variation in Heat Tolerance and Immunocompetence of Chickens Raised in Nigeria. Trends in Agricultural Sciences. 2023; 2(3): 241-248. https://doi.org/10.17311/tas.2023.241.248

Chicago/Turabian Style
Folarin, Itunuola, Anne, Mathew Wheto, Sunday Peters, Olusegun Mark Obafemi Idowu, and Christian Obiora Ndubuisi Ikeobi. 2023. "Genetic Variation in Heat Tolerance and Immunocompetence of Chickens Raised in Nigeria" Trends in Agricultural Sciences 2, no. 3: 241-248. https://doi.org/10.17311/tas.2023.241.248